Should you patent your code

By
Published ~ 1 minutes read

So Jonas Salk developed the polio vaccine and gave it away for free. Today we patent the shit out of a rounded corner rectangle and those who infringe it, we fight them to death.

Jonas Salk story is so inspiring that it almost sounds naive. Imagine a world where every time you are asked who holds the patent to your life changing invention, you answer is "There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?". Now if something as important as the polio vaccine is not patented then software patents are a joke (see 1-click patent).

You must have seen website that prevent you from right clicking, or copying text on the page. How much value is in their content anyway? Why do we hold so tightly things that have almost no value? Let it go. Sharing is caring.

Jonas Salk

Developer of Polio Vaccine, Jonas Salk. wikipedia

On a related note, here are some interesting articles.

You can only benefit from your own failure.

You can only benefit from your own failure.

In the start up world articles that talk about failure are very inspiring. It is very hard to admit that you failed and move on. On hackernews, these post almost always make it to the front page. There are a lot of praises in the comments section and people thank the poster for being so courageous. But how useful are those articles?

Disorganized learning

Disorganized learning

There are different strategies to learn something new. With a book, some people perform best with the step by step pattern going from chapter 1 to 12, others jump straight to the section they need, and some others ditch the book entirely and jump in to the problem only to find that they actually need a book or some way to acquire knowledge. I fit best in the third group. When it comes to learning I am always in a hurry. A few years ago when I was still in school, I was frustrated with the pace at which we were going in class. I did slow down eventually eventually but this had lead me to learn things in a very disorganized way.

Solving problems

Solving problems

In high school I always wondered how some kids memorized all the math formulas. Especially the long ones. I am not particularly good in math but since I am terrified with the idea of giving up I kept at it until I found ways to deal with it. I couldn't memorize the formulas but knowing the first few digits of a sine and cosine of special angles (30,45,60 and so on) proved to be very useful. I loved computers since I was a kid and I was labeled the computer guy in the family. Everyone came to me (and still do) to get help with the Microsoft Word issues, Excel, modem setup, unresponsive mouse, broken screen (not that I could do much with a broken CRT monitor), driver update, unplugged cable, and so on. I may be very disorganized but one thing I can say for sure is I almost aways find a solution to the problems presented to me.

View all articles

Comments(2)

Gerry :

As you mention in passing, there are huge differences between Salk's vaccine and 99.999% of programmers. Salk was the head of a research lab, which got tons of government money. When I worked in a government-funded lab (with a steady paycheck, and certainly far less than Salk made), I had no interest in patenting my code, either. Salk's work saved millions from a crippling disease. If you can't use the key idea in my program, the worst you'll suffer is a tiny bit of annoyance.

Startups and indie programmers need funding, and angels and VCs care primarily about how easy it would be for someone else to copy your work, and patents are a key part of that equation. Pay me as much as a medical doctor at a top research lab in a field that the government is pouring millions of dollars into, and I'll forget about patents, too. (I can say this with authority because I've been in a similar situation but paid much less than that, and I did.)

Salk wasn't nicer than us. He was already fairly rich. You might as well say "Bill Gates gives away a billion dollars a year to charity". That's great for him, but you can't expect me to do the same, unless you have some way to make me the CEO of Microsoft first.

Jerry :

Gerry, your argument falls short when you suggest that Salk didn't patent polio because he was rich. Rich people/companies do patent code or useless things. The article refers to the rounded corner patent. If you had read any further you would have seen that it is owned by Apple.

Forgive me but apple is freaking rich!!!

Let's hear your thoughts

For my eyes only