You've probably heard this one before. It might have come from a parent, a teacher, or a friend who bought an expensive item and wanted to justify it. It goes something like this:
A poor man buys a cheap pair of boots for a few dollars. They fall apart within a year, so he buys another pair. And another. Over five years, he spends far more than the man who bought one expensive, well-made pair up front. A pair that's still going strong to this day.
And the lesson was simple: buying cheap is expensive. Buy quality, and you save money in the long run.
Now swap the boots for a jacket, a phone, a kitchen knife, whatever you like. In my experience, that used to be true. I have old clothing still hanging in my closet, and they still hold together. Price and quality were correlated. If a company was going to charge you more, it needed to justify that premium with better materials, better construction, better everything. The market punished brands that didn't.
But something changed along the way. This is just my own personal observation, but I'm sure you can relate: I pay too much for things that don't last.
When I was growing up, we separated the real from the knockoff with a simple test. You flipped the product over and checked the tag. If it said "Made in China," you knew it was a cheap knockoff.
Then, somewhat suddenly, that stopped working. Walk into almost any flagship store for almost any prestige brand today, and check the label. Chances are it says the same thing as the bargain version sitting in a discount bin three blocks away. They all come from the same factories, the same supply chains, and in some cases, the very same production line. It's not the quality of the product that determines the price. What determines whether a good sells for $30 or $300 depends entirely on the brand.
Right above the "Made in China," you'll now find another line: "Designed in [prestigious country here]."
The materials didn't necessarily get worse. But the price no longer tells you what it used to.
When you pay that premium now, the price covers the ad campaigns, the celebrity endorsements, the logo, the history, the feeling of exclusivity, and the envy from your friends.
Today, price is not a proxy for quality. Businesses are simply capitalizing on brand power, that's all. When you buy something expensive, you have no guarantee that it will last. Everything should be judged on a case-by-case basis. In fact, if you're looking for goods that last, one approach is to search for "cheap alternatives" online.
The story we were always told was really about information. The poor man didn't have the money to buy quality, so he used price as a signal to gauge quality, and maybe saved up to invest in a better product. That rule has changed. Price is now just a signal of a brand's power, nothing else. To find the better product, you'll have to rely on others who've tested it and can tell you how it holds up to time.
I’ve had this issue with furniture lately, example Pottery Barn. It’s premium-priced but it’s just MDF junk with a wood veneer. To make matters worse all the sellers of veneer furniture are now advertising them as “solid wood”… which like technically and legally yes, MDF is made of wood. But I swear solid wood used to be used to advertise pieces that were grain wood all the way through, that would last through generations and could be sanded/stained again if desired.
To make matters worse, doing product research to try and find the truth is becoming exceedingly difficult. Forums barely exist. You can’t trust a YouTube review unless you’ve been following the author for a long time and know their principles. Reddit posts purporting to be end user reviews usually just seem to be astroturfing by the brand or service owner, written with generative AI.
I’ve even seen recently, brands buying a bunch of similar domains, using AI to make what look like independent blogs doing “product comparisons” and injecting them into SERPs, so it looks like all these different independent blogs are recommending their product.
Join the Conversation